Check out our books and merch at the LTV Press store

76th street – the puzzling evidence

Published on: January 21st, 2007 | Last updated: November 9, 2015 | Written by:

For decades now there has been a mystery surrounding the ’76th street’ subway station. Some old timers claim that they actually saw the station, while others refute it as absolute fiction.

The layup
Between Euclid Ave and Grant ave on the A/C line, there is a set of ‘lay up tracks below the active A line. These tracks were built with the intention of building a new tunnel out to Cross Bay Blvd. The next stop past the solid concrete wall at the end was suppose to be 76th street.

IMG_3789

IMG_3791

There are several signals installed facing this wall – this one is just a few dozen feet from the wall – where a signal would make no sense to be installed unless there was track beyond the wall to fit an actual train.

IMG_3794

Another one is a ‘homeball’ set facing the wall, just beyond which a set of switches was intended to be placed.

IMG_3869

In a nearby tower, the board that shows the various tracks through the area explicitly shows a 76th street station.

IMG_3844

Plans are clearly marked that the signals in question would be controlled by a future tower at 76th street.

Pitkin Yard
The Pitkin subway yard is connected to this tunnel, and if you go to the yard and into the tunnel, you’ll find a yard lead was built pointing out towards the east – to connect to the 76th street station and Cross bay blvd route.

IMG_3806

Actual rail ties were installed at the switches.

IMG_3817

Here, you’ll find more signals facing the wall.

IMG_3824

The wall at the end is cinder block – and looks as if it were built as an afterthought – not an actual part of the concrete tunnel.

IMG_3822

The bench wall here looks like it was chipped out after it was constructed.

IMG_3821

And still more mysterious, when you shovel dirt from under the wall, an almost endless supply of clean soil can be scooped out.

Conclusion

So what is behind these walls?

I have it on good authority that a few years ago, the MTA did some inspecting. When they drilled a hole in the concrete wall at the end of the layup, water began to trickle out. The test droll hole was quickly re-sealed.

As for the cinder block wall and soil, I can tell you several people have spent a few man-hours digging out sand and not getting through.

Was the whole tunnel filled in, or just a small section? How was this soil placed here? Was it always here in the ground, or was it purposely piled here? Wouldn’t the soil have been more gradually if they simply stopped the tunnel construction here, instead of a wall with soil packed in behind it?

Do I personally think there is a 76th station and/or more tunnel beyond the wall?
There’s just not enough evidence to say either way. The tunnel was definitely planned, the provisions for it were definitely built – right down to the signals – but what lays behind these walls – particularly the yard lead wall – are a mystery we would love to see solved.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter.

Comments

NOTE: It sometimes takes a short while for comments to be approved - unfortunately there's a lot of spam comments that come in. I absolutely love when y'all share personal stories of friends relatives etc who worked in these places. It really helps capture what these places were like before they closed up shop.

If you're feeling salty, argumentative comments completely devoid of facts (supply links to support your argument) will not be published. Got a case to state? come with the details.

30 responses to “76th street – the puzzling evidence”

  1. IBS says:

    You need to break through that cinderblock wall and find out the truth, cuz no one else is going to.

  2. A says:

    Please find out how much of 76 St is there it will show everyone it is real. You are the person to do it.

  3. BIG John says:

    When will someone go through that fucking wall and conirm if its there or not?

  4. Tom bauer says:

    Would it be possible to scan pitkin ave with ground penetrating radar? It will at least tell you if there is a void under the street or not

  5. Control says:

    Someone with deeper pockets needs to come and do that. Various other methods have been attempted over the years (some officially, some not), and this mystery persists.

  6. MTA Anon says:

    Anyone try going in through the grates by the cemetery on Pitkin around 79th – 80th st? From what I heard that’s the way in.

  7. Local Tourist says:

    MTA Anon
    The grates to those tunnels are at Conduit Ave with Sutter Ave, the southernmost one at around the intersession of Conduit Ave with 80th Street. Not by the cemetery… I don’t see what’s the need for radar technology if there’s a way in from above ground?

  8. Gene A says:

    Is there any evidence of a subway entrance to the mezzanine or platform on 76 ST.? That was my home turf I lived on 78 ST/101 AVE.

    BTW, just a side note, in 1976 while coming home from college on the A train, I missed the conductors announcement while at Euclid that the train was out of service. The doors closed and we sat for about 5 minutes then left, when I noticed something was different (turnout I never made before) I walked up the motorman, he was surprised and exclaimed &%$*#@ words and asked why I didnt get off at Euclid. He took us to the Pitkin yard we sat there another 5 minutes, he radioed the dispatcher to tell them he to backtrack to Euclid with a passenger. We walked up to the other end and he setup the controls and got clearance and we left for Euclid, along the way he was talking about the system and the tunnels and pointed out tracks to nowhere, was this the mysterious 76 ST station and tracks that I didnt know about at the time?

  9. Control says:

    Gene – great story – that was very likely the tracks intended to connect pitkin yard to the route to 76th street and beyond.

  10. Mike says:

    Well, gee, Local Tourist – if you know where it is, then why not show photos of the station?

  11. MTA Anon says:

    Conduit and sutter? You’re off by a whole block local tourist. Like mike said, If you know the way in why don’t you go and snap some pictures. Speaking of digging under the wall off the pitkin yard leads, maybe it’s not digging that should be done. How about removing a cinder block at the top of the wall? That would require a ladder and tools but at least you’ll be able to see behind the wall.

  12. Russ Nelson says:

    You can buy an inspection borescope for like $20 on EBay. Plugs into a cellphone. Has its own lighting. So drill a hole at the top of the wall, stick a pipe through until it moves freely, then stick the borescope through to see what’s on the other side of it. Very little chance of permanent harm to the wall, the railroad, or you.

  13. M says:

    Does anyone actually know where those grates by the cemetery go? MTA Anon might be onto something. The borescope thing is also a good idea, and if I had seen this a week ago I probably would have tried it while I was there.

  14. A Per/son says:

    Hey, contact me for pics, progress made at that wall. A Videoscope/Boroscope won’t help. It’s LITERALLY filled from floor to ceiling, wall to wall with sand.

  15. MTA Anon says:

    A Per/son, email me Tgrand16@mail.com. I’d like to know what you found and what progress was made at the wall.

  16. motty.nyc says:

    i was by the layup and by the wall leading off pitkin where the wall is. why is it that progress was only made by the wall leading off pitkin and not by the layup? and i can also confirm that there is a endless supply of sand in that wall

  17. Control says:

    I have it on good authority that the MTA test-drilled holes in the wall at the end of the layup years back. These small holes were quickly sealed up when water started pouring out of them.

    Obviously not a good sign…

  18. motty.nyc says:

    CONTROL
    tried digging for 10 minutes but was getting a bit late/early, i will continue tho

  19. Matt Laptev says:

    76th street station does exist.
    The Fulton Street subway was the Independent System’s main line from downtown Brooklyn to southern Queens. Construction was delayed by funding problems in the early 1930’s, solved by federal Works Progress Administration funding starting in 1936. That lasted only a few years, as work on the last portions in Brooklyn was then stopped in 1942 shortly after the nation entered World War II. The portion continuing from east of Rockaway Avenue station to Crystal St, not far west of the future Euclid Ave station, was let in 1938, and the next portion in 1940.

    After the war ended, workers and materials became available for civilian use again. The badly needed short run to a better terminal at East New York (now named Broadway Junction station) was finished in about a year, opening in December 1946. The last portion opened on 28 November 1948, running along Pennsylvania Ave and Pitkin Ave to the 76 St station just over the Queens border. It included access to a new train yard with access from both Euclid Ave and 76 St stations.

    The line no sooner opened than an unusual controversy erupted. Charges were made that the last portion had not been built and thus should not be operated. The local news media jumped on this, and in an article in the Queens edition of the Daily News for 30 November 1948, an unnamed engineer with the Fochla Brothers Contractors was quoted saying, “All I know is we built to the borough line like we were given plans, and we put up a solid concrete wall there. If they’ve knocked it out and built more, that’s fine with me, but I can tell you I never saw anyone working farther down the street than we were.” A tracklayer, also unidentified, claimed his crew had laid track to the end of their section and found another section of tunnel already completed.

    While the actual operation of trains to 76 St should have been enough to convince anyone the route existed, spooky rumors continued to spread. At the time the station opened, there were no houses at all on any of the four corners at 76 St and Pitkin Ave. A followup story in the News Queens edition on 2 December told the story of an area man who walked through the intersection each day to reach the Fulton St El station at City Line, a few blocks to the northwest: “I was walking home one day and noticed the new subway entrance. I was amazed because there was nothing there that morning. I don’t know how human beings could work so fast.”

    Pressed for a statement, Board of Transportation officials first scoffed but then days later admitted sheepishly that they could not produce contracts for construction or equipment of the portion east of Grant Avenue at the borough line. The unions, suspecting a cover-up of non-union work, threatened to take the matter to court. At this point, federal investigators stepped in. Long time local residents recall men with Air Force identification asking questions about the subway and any other unusual events in the area in the past year and a half.

    As a result of the problems related to its origins and existence, the 76 Street station was closed after less than a month of service, on 20 December 1948. The Board of Transportation covered the embarrassment by quickly preparing new maps and signs showing Euclid Avenue as the terminal, and no more was said.

    On 6 July 1949, the Board of Transportation officially adopted a plan to extend the Fulton St subway by diverging north out of Pitkin Ave at Conduit Ave and building a ramp up to the outdated Fulton St El located in Liberty Ave.

    The Hagstrom subway map showing the new subway line was replaced only a month later by a revised edition showing the line ending at Euclid Avenue.

    The only known photo taken inside 76 St station shows a train of new R 10 cars, delivered only a week before the station opened, with their original destination sign reading 76 ST /OZONE PK. This may have been taken on opening day. These were the first stations in the system to have fluorescent lighting, as shown here.

    And you thought it wasn’t there…

  20. DAVID SEDA says:

    there is something down there, find out before I PASS ON.

  21. enter.theunderground says:

    For what it’s worth, while I think that there is space behind that wall, there’s no station back there.

  22. Ken C. says:

    Considering the signal that faces the wrong way, I think it exists. For example The Atlantic Avenue tunnel was thought to be a myth until it was rediscovered in 1980.

  23. Tim says:

    I’m as curious as everyone else about what’s there, but I don’t see the signals as being evidence at all. They’re in the plans, and they’re exactly where they’re supposed to be in the plans. Someone had a contract to build the line to where they did, and that included installing signals. There are many highway ramps to nowhere because they were part of some contract for a portion of construction that happened but the extension was later cancelled. Regardless of what’s behind those walls, those signals probably got installed with the rest of the line, sat working for many years, and then simply weren’t upgraded when all the rest were.

  24. david sanquiche says:

    chip from the top. And send a drone if there is empty space at the top. time to find out the real deal.

  25. Benny K says:

    I went on google maps, accessed the street view, and noticed the intersection of 76th Street & Pitkin Avenue has a concrete section on the road, which might mean something is down there.

  26. J says:

    Benny K:
    Those concrete segments appear to be located at many bus stops along Pitkin. I would not take them as evidence for or against anything.

  27. jbr says:

    https://www.columbia.edu/~brennan/abandoned/76st.html

    This is a link to the article Matt Laptev quoted with the picture mentioned. Interestingly enough it seems like a lot of the controversy surrounding its use is a result of capitalist exploitation. It sounds to me like they essentially hired a crew of scabs on the cheap to avoid paying the union rate and when they were called on it they covered up the stations existence as labor power in the city at that time was significant. Funny how that shit always just comes down to money and power. Thanks for all the work y’all do, maybe I’ll see y’all in a tunnel sometime.

  28. Danny says:

    76 exists, read the columbia article on it

  29. James Bailey says:

    I.think.there .is.a.station.there.and.on.the.conduit.I.believe.theres.a.76st.station.underthere.if.there.wasnt.why.is.it.walled.off??

  30. Bad Guy Joe says:

    Brennan’s article was an April fools day joke many many years ago. Looks like he might need to add a big disclaimer on it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • About The Author

    Bad Guy Joe

    Bad Guy Joe
    Bad Guy Joe knows more about the NYC underground than anyone else on or below the surface of this planet. He has spent nearly 30 years sneaking into NYC's more forbidden locations. When not underground, he's probably bitching about politicians or building something digital. 
  • Newsletter: All Things Exploring

    Sign up for our weekly newsletter.
  • Social

  • Sponsor Us.

    Enjoyed this post? Give us a little love over on Patreon, and gain access to exclusive content.
    Patreon

  • Recent Comments

  • What is…

    LTVSquad.com is the blog of NYC's most notorious team of explorers. We bring you a unique roasted blend of content culled from the fringes and dark underbelly of this fine city. Consider us an Autodidact's guide to urban exploration, adventure and fringe art. Mixed with 2 part photography and video, 1 parts social commentary and (ill)legal mentality.

    All text and original photographs are copyrighted material. LTV Squad is fully staffed by a team of lawyers and we absolutely love to get our litigation on.

    Inquiries, private comments, etc: Contact Control{@}ltvsquad.com.

  • Calendar Ov Posts

    January 2007
    S M T W T F S
     123456
    78910111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    28293031  
  • LTV Press

  • -->