In the late spring of 2004, the NYC MTA considered banning all photography in and around the subway system. They did so at the request of the NYPD, who grew afraid that terrorists were documenting the subway system to plan future terror attacks.
We found this notion to be paranoid and dangerous – an infringement upon our constitutional rights. Criminalizing photography? No way. We immediately decided to hold a protest.
I set the date – June 5, 2004 – and a small army of friends spread the word. It took no time to get the ball rolling. The press started calling, and I took time off work to take point. I didn’t have to “lead” though – everyone took the ball and ran with it. When an idea is pure and just, it takes hold immediately and cannot be stopped.
For a rally cry I stole a page from Charlton Heston – “The only way they’ll get my camera is from my cold, dead hands”. Guns may be largely illegal in NYC – but photography would never be. Nope. Not in my house.
On the day of the protest Roughly 100 people turned out – an impressive showing for a hastily organized event based on what surely may have seemed like a niche issue. After 2 or 3 hours of riding around town shooting photos without incident, I knew it was a battle won. We blocked the entrance to MTA headquarters and planted out flag (the Stars and Stripes, borrowed from a squatter friend). No signs were necessary. Our cameras were our sign, and the photographs told the story in thousands more words than can be written.
The protest made the news from here to Australia. Newspaper polls showed overwhelming support for our cause. Online petitions drew thousands of signatures. Mayor Bloomberg commented that the ban was a dumb idea (one of few things I ever agreed with him on). The MTA quickly realized the idea was a non-starter, though they puttered on the issue for months hoping it would quietly go away. We made sure they knew we were watching, and would not accept any infringement upon our rights.
In the end, The proposed ban was never voted on and never spoken of again within the MTA. We fought and we won – thus preserving your god given right to take as many selfies on the subway as you jolly well want.
10 years later, one can only imagine the backwards version of NYC we would live in had the ban actually happened. Would the ban have lead to attempts at censorship of books and existing websites already containing subway photos? Would carrying a camera in NYC become automatic grounds for arrest? Women photographing pervs who expose themselves on the subway would be criminals – not victims – and their harassers not brought to justice. How far through the courts would we have to fight such a ban? (I was prepared to go all the way – my name on a Supreme Court case? Fuck yeah I’d love that). These ideas seem insane today, but 10 years ago – with the patriot act just stating to be abused, G.W. in office starting wars based on lies, and stories of new unconstitutional searches cropping up daily… The loss of more rights and fear of an ever repressive government rule felt inevitable.
Fighting and winning? It was, in many ways, a turning of the tide: a pushback against the authorities using 9/11 as an excuse to search and detain whoever they wanted. Yes, there still is terrorism paranoia out there, and cops do occasionally harass photographers, but those incidents have dwindled significantly. Having a camera in your hand doesn’t automatically make you a suspect as it did 10 years ago. Just the idea that it would is probably completely alien to many people today.
In 2004, I would estimate that only a few hundred people in NYC were carrying cameras every day. Today, just about everyone in NYC has a phone with a camera. Everyone on the subway these days is using a smartphone. Millions of people carrying cameras every day, all of whom could have become criminal suspects had we not stood up and protested.
Being a part of this small victory will always be a moment in my life I’m proud of. We were 100% right – a fact proven by the test of time. For everyone that helped in the effort, it was an honor to stand with you. A few names come to mind – ACF, Sleazy, Adolf, Zeed, Clayton and a swarm of people I never met who spread the word via message boards and pestered the MTA with petitions. All of the awesome reporters and bloggers that covered the story – Alan Feuer, Jake Dobkin, Mike Epstein, Kevin Walsh, Joe Holmes, – all come to mind, along with faces whose names I can’t recall. We were not backed by any large organizations (though some seem to claim they took part). No one compensated any of us for our efforts, and none of us would have wanted a dime for it. Looking back, it stands out as a wonderful example of a rag-tag bunch of rabblerousers who took on the powers that be and showed them who is really in charge: We, the people.
NOTE: Argumentative comments completely devoid of facts (supply links to support your arguement) will not be published.LTVSquad.com is the blog of NYC's most notorious team of explorers. We bring you a unique roasted blend of content culled from the fringes and dark underbelly of this fine city. Consider us an Autodidact's guide to urban exploration and adventure.
Privacy PolicyAll content on this website is copywritten, and actively tracked. If you steal it, you will be found and face very expensive settlement costs. To license any content on this website, contact us.
Did you know that the PATH system still prohibits photography? Do you have any plans for organizing about them in the future? They run trains in NYC too.
Joseph,
I want to commend you and your cohorts for taking on this issue and winning. I am such a strong believer that photography in public places needs to be allowed, no questions asked. I am glad to see that the number of incidents re: harassment of photographers has dwindled substantially. I hang out with many airplane photographers with huge lenses around airports. To an uninformed or paranoid person, one may think it is suspicious looking. In reality, nobody should bat an eyelash. You make a very good point that most people walking around today have smart phones (or at least cell phones with cameras) which take very good photos and video. Great job and Happy Anniversary of a fight well fought!
Didn’t know that. Do they actually try to enforce it?
I remember when this happened, I hadn’t heard of LTV back then.
FYI, according to MTA policy, it is against the rules to use a tripod for photography within the system.
I’ve never had to grapple with this restriction, but it is good to know.
Banning photos in public places is a totalitarian idea which comes from the “We should be like Europe” crowd.
About twenty years ago, Loompanics publishers released a book which detailed the laws in various nations with respect to photography. In Europe among other socialist duckponds, photographing anything in a public setting was pretty much illegal. If you took a picture of your pet Iguana with a power line in the background, that could be construed as gathering evidence on electric power grids.
The statist paranoia behind this idiocy is breathtaking and unsettling. Anything, photographing your pals atop a dam? You’re a potential terrorist who is gathering data on dams for a future attack, according to these laws in Oulde Europe.
Thank your for opposing yet another mindless, soulless, attack on our rights perpetrated by those in love with unbridled power.
We give so-called terrorists entirely too much credit. It didn’t take much brains to jack jets, overpower the staff, and fly them into buildings. It just took a willingness to do what the other guy wouldn’t.
One needn’t have photos of subway terminals which show the location of the restrooms to make trouble, terrorists go for the cheapshot everytime.
Beyond that, shouldn’t we have seen the last of so-called ‘terrorists’ after the expenditure of all this blood and treasure for so long?
They do enforce it on PATH.